Day: March 25, 2021

  • She Was Just Walking Home

    She Was Just Walking Home

    We have tried apps, tried keys, avoiding the bus and taking a taxi, phone calls, wearing flat shoes, panic button key chains, avoiding going out at night altogether, we have surrendered independence, tried running, tried screaming, tried to keep our head down, tried crossing the road, tried hiding in a crowd. Not one thing will change until the men that do it do.”

    anonymous

     

    Sarah Everard, a 33-year-old UK woman went missing on March 3rd, 2021, after walking home from a friend’s house. She was last seen at 9:30 PM when she was captured on a doorbell camera walking alone toward Tulse Hill.

    A week later, Everard’s body was found in woodland near Ashford, Kent. It is suspected she had been raped and murdered by 48-year-old police officer, Wayne Couzins.

    The tragedy hits home for women across the world. Vigils and protests are taking place, and on the rise is a social movement, “Not All Men”, and counter arguments addressing violence against women.

    When a woman hears news of another woman being abused – no matter where in the world she is – she thinks, “that easily could have been me.” It easily could have been a friend, a neighbour, a teacher, a family member. Women around the world run the risk of being raped and killed every day the second they leave their homes. Even when they are inside their houses, it runs through the back of their mind.

    This is why women walk with keys between their knuckles at night; this is why women check behind their cars and, in their backseats, and drive away before turning their GPS or their music on.

    In the UK, 97 per cent of women report being sexually harassed by men. It may not be “all men”, but it is enough men. It is enough men for females to fear all men. So, it may not be “all men”, but it is all women.

    However, it is not just men who rape and murder, domestic abusers, molesters, or men who take advantage of women. It is men who are “only joking”, men who grope, spike drinks and ignore the word, “no”. It is men who “rate” girls, it is victim blamers, unsolicited picture senders, stalkers and men who refuse to take any responsibility for their own or their friends actions. It is the men who dismiss women speaking up.

    It is men who stay silent.

     

    Not being “one of the bad guys”, is not good enough. Unless you are actively working to dismantle the patriarchy, you are part of the problem.

    You can be a loving husband, brother or friend to women, and you can still be part of the problem. Here is why; loving women is the basic minimum; nobody gets an award for treating men like they are human. When women love and respect men it is seen as their duty, but when men do the same, women are expected to be thankful.

    What a privilege it is for a man to not understand why his female friend asks him to walk her home at night. What a privilege it is to be able to park in a parking garage at night alone, or park far away from the entrance and not have to circle the parking lot waiting for a closer spot to open up. What a privilege it is to be paid what you deserve or more for your work. What a privilege it is to not be scared when being home alone. What a privilege it is to not worry about what you are wearing in case you are sexually assaulted, and people blame your clothes.

    It is always the clothes, it is always the amount of alcohol, it is always the amount of flirting and it is always the woman’s past or reputation. It is never the man.

    To all “good” men; check yourself. Check how you are talking to bad guys, why you tag along when they make offside comments to women. Check why you defend your friends and laugh when they make sexist jokes, rape jokes. Are you telling them it isn’t funny or are you provoking their behaviour? What are you doing when other men slut-shame women? Call yourself out, and then call out your family members and even your “buddies”. Surround yourself with people who recognize their own (male) privilege and entitlement and are diligently working to make the world a safer place for women to live.

    To all women with internalized misogyny; check yourself, too. Check what kind of treatment you accept from your male coworkers, friends and partners. Check how you idolize “good” men for doing the basic minimum. Check how you silence other women for speaking out and, especially, understand that an internalized misogynistic mindset has been ingrained in you by a society and institutions that actively oppress women. Do better, be better.

    Finally, let us all remember that feminism is only effective if it is intersectional. Speak out for impoverished women, disabled women, racialized women, transgender women and all marginalized groups of women. The real fight is against the system.

     

    Not only has Sarah Everard’s tragic death opened the doors to a whole conversation about gender violence, but it has been a wake-up call for most people.

    Not all men are sexually violent, but not all men choose to challenge misogyny, sexist jokes, stereotypes, objectification, victim-blaming, and patriarchal structures.

    It might not be “all men”, but it is enough men to make women afraid. It might not be “all men”, but it very well might be you.

  • SRC Decoded: What you missed March 19th, 2021

    SRC Decoded: What you missed March 19th, 2021

    The Students’ Representative Council (SRC) is a council composed of a body of students elected by their peers, who are tasked with running the Acadia Students’ Union (ASU). The SRC meets every Friday at 1:00 PM on Teams, however, they would usually meet in the Beveridge Forum located off the Michener Lounge in the Students’ Union Building (SUB). Each meeting is open to the public and students are welcome to attend meetings to learn more about the decisions being made on their behalf.

    The SRC met last Friday afternoon over Teams for their weekly meeting. After quickly taking attendance and passing the agenda, the meeting began. This meeting focused primarily of the ASU Bylaw review with some conversation also surrounding SOMETHING

    The significant matter brought to the floor was the possibility of an annual general meeting (AGM), which was addressed by Lydia Houck, VP Academic, and Robbie Holmes, VP Student Life. Lydia asked the rest of the council for suggestions on the best times/dates that would provide the best turnout for both council members and the student body. Robbie added that this would be a valuable event for incoming members of the council to gain information through student feedback so they can best represent their constituencies next year. The biggest question was whether to host the meeting before or after exams; council members saw benefits and drawbacks to each, but it seemed they were leaning towards holding it shortly after exams. No final decisions were made.

     

    The Ripen Partnership

    Brendan MacNeil led this discussion, first explaining that Ripen is a platform for work-integrated learning by allowing employers across any field of work to post a project for students. Students who are registered can then sign up to do this project – these are intended to be done as class projects –, allowing them to gain valuable work experience and be compensated for it (through the Canadian government) while the employer benefits from the work. The ASU has signed up for this initiative as an employer so that they can hire students, giving them the opportunity to gain valuable work experience related to their degree, and get paid for it! Brendan went on to explain that this program is available equally to all degrees, but since it is a government-funded program through taxpayer dollars, it is available only to domestic students. He mentioned that when the ASU met with the program coordinators to register, this issue of opening this opportunity up to international students was a significant topic of discussion and something they are committed to continually addressing. Robbie explained their plans for working with provincial student organizations to help lobby the government into expanding the program. Jordi Chaffer, Science Senator, spoke up, asking whether the ASU would continue with the program if it did not open up to international students, highlighting the unfair advantage this opportunity would give to domestic students.

    Lydia Houck spoke up, explaining that what she thought it was the most important remember that this program was in the very early stages of its implementation; the federal government wanted to gather initial data on the program’s functioning and that an expansion to include international students is something that would hopefully be eventually included by the time the program started running at Acadia. Many council members spoke up to stress the importance of ensuring the playing field is levelled for all students at Acadia. As this was just a discussion item, not a motion, the conversation ended shortly thereafter.

    Menat Tahoun, Professional Studies Senator, led the next topic of discussion, regarding international student representation on SRC. She explained that although in the past years there has been a much more diverse council, it would be valuable to create a position whose sole purpose is to represent and advocate for international students. Menat reasoned that this would ensure international student representation on the council, regardless of which students fill other roles – international or not. Chairperson Molly Anderson paused the conversation to add that this has been a matter of discussion in previous councils and that during those conversations the final consensus was generally that international students fell under the jurisdiction of the Diversity and Inclusion Representative. Soyini Edwards, who currently fills that position, expressed her concern that by putting these students under her representation, her position becomes a “melting pot” for any diverse representation at Acadia, and agreed that a council member dedicated solely to the representation of international students would be very useful. Robbie Holmes, VP Student Life, spoke up in support of this idea and also theorized about some ways it would work logistically so that international students did not have to choose between running for the International Student Representative and another role on SRC. Lara Hartman, Arts Senator, added how this type of position would also be important for other groups on campus, such as a representative for Indigenous students. Soyini made an impassioned speech echoing what she and other councillors had previously said, and driving home the idea that if the SRC is not doing their job to represent all students at Acadia, then the council is irrelevant.

    Lara Hartman spoke up to voice her distaste for the tokenized role that students who are non-white/Canadian have been on council, essentially being given the role or presenting, in Lara’s case all Indigenous peoples on campus, despite her role as the Arts Senator. She problematized this pattern of tokenism and suggested that the solution would be more seats for diverse populations on the council. Robbie Holmes answered, apologizing on behalf of the council if any of their actions made her feel that way, and concurred that this phenomenon of visible minorities representing their population on council rather than or in addition to their official position is something that needs to change. Robbie made the motion to direct this conversation to the Governance Committee, and that motion was passed.

    After a few brief announcements, namely a bylaw review happening next week that students are encouraged to go to and a Women’s Conference on the 27th, this week’s meeting was adjourned.

Betzillo positions itself as a versatile gaming hub where structured bonuses and adaptive gameplay mechanics support both short sessions and extended play.

Built with a focus on innovation, Spinbit integrates modern casino architecture with rapid transactions, appealing to players who value speed and digital efficiency.

Ripper Casino emphasizes bold entertainment through high-impact slot titles and competitive promotions crafted for risk-oriented players.

A friendly interface and stable performance define Ricky Casino, offering a casual yet reliable environment for a wide spectrum of gaming preferences.

King Billy Casino channels classic casino spirit into a modern platform, delivering recognizable themes supported by contemporary reward systems.

Immersive visuals and layered slot mechanics are at the core of Dragonslots, creating a narrative-driven casino experience.

Lukki Casino appeals to players seeking direct access and minimal friction, focusing on fast loading times and intuitive controls.

Casinonic provides a structured and dependable gaming framework, blending modern slots with transparent operational standards.