Tag: Islam

  • ‘Islam is a Religion in Crisis’: A True Statement that Cannot Be Taken at Face Value

    ‘Islam is a Religion in Crisis’: A True Statement that Cannot Be Taken at Face Value

    The Golden Age of Islam 

    The Golden Age of Islam lasted for over 400 years, from the 8th to the 13th century, and exerted influence over northern Africa, western Asia and the Middle East. It was initiated by Harun al-Rishad, who was Caliph of the Abbasid Caliphate. He inaugurated the House of Wisdom in the Caliphate’s capital of Baghdad which was the largest city in the world at the time and is now the capital of modern-day Iraq. The Islamic Golden Age is one of the great periods of cultural, economic and scientific prosperity in human history. One major influence on the success of this Golden Age was the Caliphate’s inclusivity of scholars and polymaths, who came from different cultures and would travel to Baghdad in order to translate the world’s classical knowledge into the Arabic and Persian languages. The Caliphate wanted to assimilate the scientific knowledge of the civilizations it had conquered and wanted to attract some of their brightest minds to further develop these scientific achievements. Another influence to consider is Islam’s unhindered focus and dedication to scientific discovery, which encouraged and attracted some of the best minds of the age to convene in Baghdad and further develop their areas of study. In a time when conquest and rivalry were paramount to the success of an empire, the ruling Muslims of this Golden Age dedicated enormous resources to the assimilation and development of cultural, economic and scientific research. During the 400-year tenure of this Golden Age, the religion and culture of Islam became one of inclusivity, scientific development, and education. 

    The Golden Age of Islam is said to have truly come to an end after a Mongol horde pillaged and ransacked much of the Arab world, culminating in the siege and entire destruction of Baghdad in 1258. This led to the dissolution of the Abbasid Caliphate, many wars, and the eventual rise of the Ottoman Empire.    

     

    The Rise of Islamic Extremism and Radical Islam 

    The rise of Islamic extremism can be attributed to a failure in post-colonialism transitioning, military interventions by Western powers, and poor leadership in Arab countries. 

    Firstly, the post-colonial transitioning. After World War I, the Ottoman Empire was broken up by the allied victors with the Treaty of Sèvres and the Treaty of Lausanne. These treaties created the French Mandate of Syria and Lebanon, the British Mandate of Palestine and the British Mandate of Mesopotamia, now known as Iraq. The ‘mandate’, simply refers to mandatory power, denoting which allied victor would occupy each new territory while they developed independent governments. The issue with this post-colonial transitioning, from the Ottoman Empire to independent territories, was that the leading families who had amassed power and wealth during the Empire’s 600-year reign kept and eventually expanded their wealth. This transition from Empire to independent territories saw minimal wealth or power distribution. This failed the middle and lower classes, who were promised equity by the mandating powers, but instead had to get used to a ‘new normal’. This involved families of power and relation to ex-royals being able to pull their vast wealth and power from the Ottoman Empire into the new territories, and continue into the new world. 

    Secondly, the Middle East has played host to countless military interventions by Western countries, but also by nations within the region. In 1980, Saddam Hussein of Iraq invaded Iran, starting the Iran-Iraq war which lasted for eight years and claimed over one million lives. This was immediately followed by the Gulf War, wherein the US and coalition forces worked to end the Hussein regime, followed by the Iraq War, in which the US and coalition forces had to fight against an insurgency which rose up to defy the occupiers and the newly created government. These conflicts, in most cases, have left the host countries worse off than they were. While the US-led toppling of the Iraqi dictator was meant to stabilize the area and bring freedom to Iraqi citizens, it instead created an unsecured power vacuum and has led to an increase in lawlessness and subsequent foreign interference. The military interferences of western counties in the middle east over the last 30 years have created two generations of citizens who are poor, uneducated and carry with them a hatred for the US and for many Western countries. The pure grief, anguish, and unrelenting hopelessness that is felt by much of these generations creates the possibility for terrorist-Jihadism and terrorist groups who are hellbent on bringing destruction to western nations in retribution for the destruction Western nations have brought to their own, while also seeking to expand their radical ideologies to their areas of operation. 

    It is important to understand the difference between the Holy Quran’s denotation of Jihadism and the idea of Jihadism used by terror groups. The most proper understanding of Jihad is that it refers to ‘struggle’. This struggle can be any sort of struggle experienced during day-to-day life or throughout one’s life, albeit one of significant importance. Terror groups have mutated the meaning of Jihadism into a struggle of holy war which they choose to wage based on their own repugnant ideologies. 

    Thirdly, poor leadership of Arab countries, leaders which were unable to deliver meaningful outcomes to their people. In being objective, Arab nations such as Syria, Iraq, Sudan and Egypt have had leaders who were unable to deliver meaningful outcomes to their people. The lack of distribution of wealth and power, the futile attempts at participation in politics by citizens, the absence of progressive societal changes and the sheer aversion for adaptation to the modern world by these leaders have pitted their citizens against them, and have forced their citizens to congregate for political change outside of political institutions, usually in Mosques. For citizens that have been terrorized by foreign militaries, their recuperation is usually to be taken into their own hands, with limited help or support from the government. The alienation of an already unhappy population by the leading people has created a direct relation between this misery and religion. This creates a breeding ground for terrorist-led Jihadism and terrorist groups who can be created using rhetoric that sounds surprisingly reasonable, despite its entirely unreasonable nature. 

     

    Islam: A Religion in Crisis

    After the beheading of Samuel Paty, a French educator who was teaching a class on freedom of expression – where he showed cartoons of the Prophet Muħammad, the French President Emmanuel Macron claimed that Islam is a religion in crisis. This comment caused both condonation and condemnation from the Muslim world. To many Muslims, it is, of course, entirely improper to have their religion degraded by a non-Muslim and leader of a western country. However, proper context must be applied to President Macrons’ words, which he provided in an interview with Aljazeera, a Qatari-based Arab news agency. Islam is a religion in crisis not because it is inferior or faulty, but rather because of its multiple terrorist branches, such as ISIL, Boko Haram or Al-Qaeda, and because of terrorist acts committed in the name of Islam such as the 9/11 attacks in America, ISIL massacres in Syria, the Easter Bombings in Sri Lanka, and most recently, the beheading of Samuel Paty and the attacks in France and Austria.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_rSzeweybM

    Radical Islam is real and is caused in part by the three attributions listed earlier. It is also a global issue with attacks happening in countries such as Canada, America, France, Germany, Russia, China, Japan and Australia, to name a few. Radical Islam is not at all condoned by Muslims as a whole, and the ideals of these terror groups are repugnant to Muslims as a whole as well. These groups are not a reflection of Islam but are rather the product of many years of maltreatment, suffering and injustice. 

     

    Drawing the Prophet Muħammad

    The issue of drawing the Prophet Muħammad has recently received widespread coverage. It caused the beheading of Samuel Paty and creates a deep misunderstanding of Islam by westerners. This issue is serious and is reported on without providing the public with enough information, which is unacceptable given its apparent severity and relation to life or death when dealing with radical Islamists. The Prophet Muħammad requested his followers not draw him for fear of eventually being worshiped as God and not as a messenger of God. Muslims abide by this principle and extend it to other prophets such as ʿĪsā (Jesus) or Mūsā (Moses) – to draw one of Allāh’s prophets is unthinkable. This is an aspect of the Islamic religion that should be understood and respected. Christianity, which is centred around Jesus, who is also the Prophet ʿĪsā, encourages the drawings and depictions of Jesus, who is regarded as the human form of god. This is what the Islamic prophets wanted to avoid, and this is why drawings of the prophets are unacceptable in the eyes of Islamic worshipers.

     

    Moving Forward 

    Moving forward, it is important for non-Muslims to understand Islam in its proper stance; as a religion of tolerance, peace, equality and social justice. You can do your part by sharing this publication, which can serve as a paper on basic understanding.  It is also important for Muslims to understand how most non-Muslims view Islam as product of what our news has shown us. These uneducated views should not be met with hostility, but rather with empathy and education. To change these views for the better, there must be education, and for there to be education, there must be those willing to teach. Prior to researching Islam and talking with Muslims to write this paper, I knew almost none of what I have now written about. I now have a basic understanding of Islam, and I will be a better person because of it. I implore non-Muslims to educate themselves on Islam, the world’s second-largest religion, and I implore Muslims to help educate those who possess distorted or misguided views of Islam. As a religion in crisis, it is also a religion that can be repaired. There will be a second Islamic Golden Age and humanity will be entirely better off as a result.

    I give special thanks to Mr. Sanad, Mr. Shaghay, Mr. Yassin and Mrs. Yari, for helping me write this paper.

     

    Peyton Baird

    أتمنى لك نهارا سعيدا

  • Sha…Really Really Disappointed

    Sha…Really Really Disappointed

    Editor-in-Chief’s Note: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official position of The Athenaeum.

    Those of you who regularly read The Athenaeum will likely remember my article “Sha…really?” published in January of this year. The basis of the article was an examination of why it is that those of the Islamic faith seem so intolerant and abusive towards certain equity groups. After Dr. Jeffrey Sachs’ lackluster response I asked the editor-in-chief at the time if he would allow me to publish a response and was told it would be akin to “beating a dead horse”. Well, I’m an editor now, and I think it’s worth a response.

    There were a number of reactions to my article on Shari’a law. Since the time of publishing I’ve experienced a great deal of snide remarks and insinuations that I’m either a member of the alt-right or that I’m “publishing poisonous garbage”. Other students felt differently, I was approached by a number of colleagues who seemed quite excited that I was speaking out about the intolerance and hate that often precipitates in countries that are Muslim majority regions and/or follow Shari’a. It recently came to my attention that some members of the student community are still rather salty about it, and since it has so many knickers in a knot I thought it was about time I write on the topic again. So, in this article I’ll be responding to Dr. Sachs, and furthering my examination of what I believe to be a great example of oppression.

    I have several things to say about Dr. Sachs’ response. First, a degree in Islamic studies unfortunately does not mean one can avoid using demonstrable fact to defeat an argument. Further, the aggressive cherry picking of the 2015 Pew research poll I used as a basis for one of my arguments was a gross mischaracterization of the data. He said: “But according to a 2015 survey, Muslims in the USA are fairly mainstream in their views about LGBTQ+ issues, and are actually more accepting of homosexuality (45% approve) than are many other groups, like Evangelical Christians (36%), Mormons (36%), and Jehovah’s Witnesses (16%)”. These claims are correct, but the groups you cite represent the three least tolerant groups out of the nearly 20 groups surveyed. Dr. Sachs’ response failed to meet my expectations, or as I said in my previous article “I would challenge anyone to name a religion that sees these things as crimes and would suggest the same punishments for it. Or perhaps another religion that issues fatwas which are spontaneous religious decrees. Christianity? No. Judaism? No. Catholicism? No.” So yes, Evangelical Christians, Mormons, and Jehovah’s Witnesses are less tolerant of homosexuality than Muslims, but Muslims are still incredibly more intolerant of homosexuality than almost all other religious groups (at least according to the survey). In the same survey those of the Islamic faith are also some of the most intolerant of same sex marriage. I will say that the Pew poll had a slightly flawed methodology with a margin of error larger than I would like however, Pew is often considered an excellent source and overwhelmingly illustrates that Muslims do not think highly of homosexuals, probably because it is prohibited within their religious doctrine.

    Perhaps the most recent despicable example of the mistreatment of homosexuals in a Muslim majority region comes from Chechnya. In May, 2017 the headlines were reading things like “Alleged Gay ‘Concentration Camps’ In Chechnya Spark Global Outrage”. All occurring in Muslim majority areas, these attacks on members of the LGBTQ+ community are yet another glaring example of intolerance and abuse that eventually resulted in the death of three men. Dr. Sachs also seemed to brush off the fact that these abuses “are very uncommon and overwhelmingly occur in just four or five countries”. Well, in areas where Shari’a is law, which is certainly more than four or five countries and indeed is in some places seems to be a regional thing, these abuses occur yearly if not monthly. For example: in 2014, Time published an article where they discussed “Growing religious conservatism is threatening LGBT rights in Muslim-majority nations across Southeast Asia, say activists, with a new report claiming serious abuses against Malaysia’s transgender community”. The NGO, “Human Rights Watch” published a paper on the human rights abuses in Muslim majority Malaysia. The paper covers the plight of 16 wedding guests, who after being convicted of “transvestitism” by the state sponsored Shari’a court, were taken to prison for a week. Some notable quotes: “They were taken to prison and placed in a segregated cell in the male prison block, where they had their heads shaved. The judge at the Sharia court humiliated them, telling them they looked more “handsome” with shaved heads. After serving their sentences, they were released, having become the latest casualty of state sponsored discrimination on the basis of gender identity.”

    It seems as though there is a significant problem in academia when discussions about tolerance are involved. Apparently its all well and good to be hyper-critical of homophobia and misogyny as long as you’re not shining the spotlight on Islam or Islamic law. I wasn’t clear enough in my article, but I would be equally critical of any other religion or group if I saw these sorts of things happening. I won’t deny that Christianity is rife with anti-gay phrases within it’s holy book and I certainly won’t pretend that Catholic priests should work at daycares, but when I see a headline that gay men are interned in concentration camps I think somebody should start talking about why. I’ve taken an interest, done my best to educate myself, and I have found a direct and almost undeniable connection between certain parts of Islamic Shari’a law and the abuse of women and members of the LGBTQ+ community. Its time that we stop shutting our eyes to hate, intolerance, and violence in the name of political correctness. What is more distressing is the willingness of a member of faculty to insinuate that a student is actively Islamophobic for speaking up. The labeling of those who dissent against the violence of Islam as “Islamophobic” is nefariously lazy politics. To speak candidly, I expected to read the response and have my standpoint destroyed. I was disappointed.

    All my sources for my writing should be made available at the end of this article.
    Disagree with me? Write for The Ath.

    Sources:

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/chechnya-gay-concentration-camps_us_58ece3d2e4b0ca64d9194e28

    http://time.com/3424509/malaysia-transgender-lgtb-sharia-southeast-asia-gay-homosexuality-transexual-transwoman/

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/21/gay-lgbt-muslim-countries-middle-east

    https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/09/24/im-scared-be-woman/human-rights-abuses-against-transgender-people-malaysia

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-27307249

    http://www.pewforum.org/2015/11/03/chapter-4-social-and-political-attitudes/

     

  • Response to “Sha…Really?” by Christopher Vanderburgh nee The Athenaeum 79.5

    In an article published in The Athenaeum last month, Christopher Vanderburgh launched a sweeping attack on shari’a, or Islamic law, linking it to everything from “backwards thinking” and sexism to beatings, rape, and beheadings. It’s a provocative piece. Unfortunately, it is also one that will leave its readers with a highly misleading impression of Islamic law.

    The truth about Islamic law is that for the most part, it’s incredibly boring. Forget about those beatings and beheadings for a moment. Most of the shari’a is about proper religious practice, like what to eat, how to pray, or when to fast. Drawing on the Qur’an and the example set by the Prophet Muhammad, its main purpose is to set guidelines for how to be a good Muslim. Take the example of personal hygiene. Should a Muslim wash before prayer? If so, what parts of the body? How did the Prophet do it? What did he do when there was no water nearby? What if there is water, but it’s not very clean? What if you’ve cleaned yourself, but then someone sneezes on you before you can start your prayers, and you feel like you should wash a second time but the service is about to start? Believe it or not, there’s a book for that.

    For the vast majority of Muslims today, this is what Islamic law means: instructions for how to be a good Muslim and to live your faith out loud. That doesn’t mean that things like beheadings and stonings don’t ever happen (they do), but they are very uncommon and overwhelmingly occur in just four or five countries. That’s definitely four or five too many, but they in no way represent the meaning of shari’a for the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims.

    There’s more: in addition to being boring, Islamic law is also incredibly diverse. Without any “pope” or supreme religious leader, there are as many versions of the shari’a as there are individual Muslims. Unlike with Roman Catholic canon law or the Canadian criminal code, there is no authoritative book of Islamic law that Muslims can consult. Instead, it’s a body of law driven by individual scholars and judges, each of whom has his or her own opinion about how Muslims should live their lives. Opinions of the most popular and respected scholars have the most authority, but it’s an authority derived mainly from public consensus.

    In a lot of ways, Islamic law is like Wikipedia, where anyone can add their two cents, but only the most knowledgeable and well-sourced opinions will stick around for long. Except with Islamic law, there are many competing Wikipedias, each with its own readers, entries, editors, and experts. The whole thing is a vast, contradictory mess – which is precisely what makes sweeping generalizations about shari’a impossible.

    Unfortunately, all of this complexity tends to get lost in our current climate of Islamophobia and anti-Muslim bigotry. There’s a lot of bad information out there, especially on the internet. For example, Vanderburgh claims that forty-five percent of American Muslims disapprove of homosexuality. I wish that number were lower! But according to a 2015 survey, Muslims in the USA are fairly mainstream in their views about LGBTQ+ issues, and are actually more accepting of homosexuality (45% approve) than are many other groups, like Evangelical Christians (36%), Mormons (36%), and Jehovah’s Witnesses (16%). Moreover, Muslims and Christians in America support same-sex marriage in roughly equal numbers. I doubt things are very different in Canada. So why do only Muslims get singled out for special suspicion?

    Similar myths exist about Muslims overseas as well. One popular claim on Facebook right now is that Muslim refugees have caused a rape crisis in Sweden (they haven’t). Another myth is that Muslims don’t believe in democracy (it varies, but most do). On some issues, Muslims actually rank much better than non-Muslims do. For example, Canadians and Americans are much more likely to support military attacks on civilians than are people in the Middle East – probably because most Canadians and Americans, unlike Middle Easterners, never need to think of themselves as being on the receiving end of a military attack. What does it say about Canadian culture that so many us support attacking civilians? We’ll never know, because questions about the link between Canadian culture and violence are hardly ever asked. Unlike with Islam.

    I don’t want to sugarcoat things. In many parts of the world, terrible acts of brutality get carried out in the name of shari’a. And there really are elements of Islamic law that conflict with liberal norms like gender equality and religious tolerance. But that’s not the reality for the vast majority of Muslims worldwide, and it’s certainly not the reality for Muslims living here in Canada. On the other hand, Islamophobia is a reality in Canada, as we were all reminded by this month’s tragic events in Quebec City. That’s why we always need to be on our guard: against fear, against sensationalism, and against those who want to turn a blind eye.

    Jeffrey Sachs teaches in the Department of Politics. He has a PhD in Islamic Studies from McGill University. 

     

Betzillo positions itself as a versatile gaming hub where structured bonuses and adaptive gameplay mechanics support both short sessions and extended play.

Built with a focus on innovation, Spinbit integrates modern casino architecture with rapid transactions, appealing to players who value speed and digital efficiency.

Ripper Casino emphasizes bold entertainment through high-impact slot titles and competitive promotions crafted for risk-oriented players.

A friendly interface and stable performance define Ricky Casino, offering a casual yet reliable environment for a wide spectrum of gaming preferences.

King Billy Casino channels classic casino spirit into a modern platform, delivering recognizable themes supported by contemporary reward systems.

Immersive visuals and layered slot mechanics are at the core of Dragonslots, creating a narrative-driven casino experience.

Lukki Casino appeals to players seeking direct access and minimal friction, focusing on fast loading times and intuitive controls.

Casinonic provides a structured and dependable gaming framework, blending modern slots with transparent operational standards.