Tag: God

  • God said cigarettes.

    God said cigarettes.

    I’ve never seen God, but my brother did once. In 2007, hopelessly lost on a hiking trail in northern France, he stumbled across a field of matted grass. A train was passing through the field. He watched the windows of the train fly past, all so similar to one another. None were open but one. Towards the end of the train’s meandering body, a man in robes was sticking out his head into the wind; his mane of brown hair sent in every direction. To this day, my brother swears this man was God. He was not the spitting image of paintings or stained-glass windows. His skin was wrinkled and olive-coloured and He smoked a Gitanes cigarette. Upon seeing my brother in the field, He said just one word. Josh has never told me what this word was (and I have long suspected that he never even heard what it was), but he has suggested to me once or twice that it was three syllables long. The train was gone just as Josh realized what he had seen. When He saw Josh running after him, God vaguely waved and disappeared into the green of the horizon.

    Several minutes later, Josh’s hiking friends caught up with him, running and panting “Where were you?” He didn’t explain it to them. There were bigger worries, like how to get back to the trailhead. After some argument, the young men followed the train-tracks back into town. Josh bade his hiking friends farewell to walk back in time for dinner. He was halfway through the final week of his stay with our parents’ friends, the Mansouris. We visited the Mansouris once as kids and speaking truly, we barely knew them, but Josh was cutting any expenses he could in his trip across Europe. Josh says they were gracious hosts and that their cooking was exquisite.

    He remembers it quite clearly: for dinner there was roasted salmon and green beans and yogurt and strawberries. Like most meals he ate there, it passed in near-perfect silence. They ate their food and the sun set from behind the kitchen windows and every few minutes, Elodie would look at Josh. Her parents didn’t notice, or maybe they pretended not to. Following a fast ten minutes, Josh asked to be excused in some very tacky French and walked down to the harbour. It was a few minutes down a narrow street; the clouds were almost purple from being so grey and so dark. 

    It was called a harbour. Nowadays, the water there is too shallow for the exchange of merchandise, and the only vessel was a hardly-necessary bright orange life raft, barely visible in the dusk. Josh got out his pack of American cigarettes and sat down, his legs dangling over the wall moss that grows down to the water. He tells me that this was his first real chance to think over what he had seen. There was no good reason to assume that the man on the train was God, other than his exquisitely long beard, but Josh couldn’t get the thought of his head. He thought about calling his friend Kristjan, and he thought about calling me, but he was convinced we would laugh at him. We wouldn’t understand how His eyes looked through Josh, like a blind man who knows exactly what he is seeing. We couldn’t ever know the mythical awe that Josh felt, staring up at the open window. Nobody else I’ve ever talked to has even claimed to have seen God. Only Josh. This was one way he would always be alone. 

    When Elodie cleared her throat, Josh says he nearly jumped down into the river with fright. She apologized and sat next to him. Josh has never told me this, but I suspect he offered her a cigarette at that moment. Back then, Josh offered everyone cigarettes. They sat there in silence, listening to waves lap against bricks, either smoking or not smoking. Elodie broke the silence. “Your suitcase is packed.”

    Josh nodded and laughed in the way that he does. “Yes it is.” 

    “I’m going to Spain with you.”

    “Ellie, please.”

    “I’m all packed tooーI’ll leave a note. Mom will be angry with me, but she’ll get over it! I’m 18 years old, I’m an adult.”

    Josh sighed and focused extra hard on the darkness of trees across the water. He tries not to be insensitive. “We’ve had a good few weeks, ok. I’m sorry. I shouldn’t have ever…I’m sorry about this.” 

    “You’re leaving tonight. You used me.”

    Josh threw his cigarette down to the life raft. He missed, and watched it bounce into the void. It made a fizzling noise. “Kind of, yeah I did. You used me too.”

    “How?” 

    When Josh didn’t answer, Elodie left. Josh stayed at the harbour, trying to perfectly recall what His face looked like. He had a birthmark on His left cheek, but perhaps it was a scar. Which one was it? Two hours passed. Josh walked back to the house. He was careful to be quiet walking upstairs. The wood was loud, and the Mansouris were light sleepers. His suitcase and his backpack were laid out on the bare mattress. There was a note with ripped edges balancing on the suitcase: Elodie’s e-mail written in pen. Josh folded the note into his back pocket, picked up his stuff, and left. That night, he slept at the train station. God wasn’t waiting for him. 

  • God and Science?

    God and Science?

    According to the most recent Statistics Canada census taken in 2011, 76.1% of Canadians reported having an affiliation with a religion. This number includes those who are only nominally involved and has likely declined since then. Regardless, the reality is that millions of Canadians believe in some sort of supernatural reality.

    With any sort of belief or conviction, there are bound to be perspectives of it held by others that are stereotypical, and at times, do not accurately represent the belief.

    One such perspective I want to address is the notion that one cannot believe in both God and Science.

    THE HISTORY OF THE “CONFLICT”

    Historians of Science call the idea that science and religion are incompatible the “conflict thesis.” The origins of this thesis can be traced back to the late 19th century, to two men in particular, Andrew Dixon White and John William Draper. These men have something in common: they each wrote their own book about the history of the “conflict” or “warfare” between science and religion.

    The reasons White and Draper wrote these books were not rooted in a love for history at all. White was the first president of Cornell University and wrote in reaction against denominational Christian criticism on the founding of Cornell as a non-denominational institution. Draper, an amateur historian and first president of the American Chemical Society, wanted to indict the Catholic Church for abuses of power.

    When you dig beneath the surface of these two books, you discover that they are motivated more by politics than truth. Dr. Lawrence Principe, History of Science and Technology professor at Johns Hopkins University, states that “The problem with the books is that they’re terrible history. The historical facts … are cherry-picked or contorted, taken out of context in order to promote that authors’ main ideas about this perpetual warfare between science and religion.” Historian Dr. Edward B. Davis adds, “The idea that science and religion have been always involved in this inevitable conflict is not true.”

    Although the historical “conflict” is, in reality, a 150-year-old political tool built upon falsities, this has not prevented modern media from continuing to treat it as legitimate history. I believe this is why so many people still think that there actually is a conflict between science and religion today – it is assumed to be the case and not something to be questioned.

    DON’T THE TEACHINGS OF RELIGION CONFLICT WITH SCIENCE?

    Recently, a friend of mine told me about their experience at a bar. A stranger noticed his necklace with a cross on it and asked my friend if he was a Christian. When my friend said “yes,” the stranger countered, “so you don’t believe in evolution then?” My friend clarified that he did, and that he affirms the modern scientific consensus on human origins.

    While I cannot speak for every religion, drawing from my specific experience studying the Bible and Christian Theology, I can say quite assuredly that science does not conflict with the Christian worldview. Yes, there are some that deny evolution and believe that the Earth is only thousands of years old, but those convictions are based on an interpretation of the Bible that is rejected by many Christian scholars today, and this understanding is not at all central to the Christian faith. Dr. John Walton, an eminent Old Testament Scholar, writes that “if neither exegesis nor theology intractably demands those conclusions that argue against the modern scientific consensus … we have no compelling reason to contest the science.”

    CONCLUDING THOUGHTS AND AN INVITATION

    Whether or not a person believes in God or some other supernatural reality is entirely up to them. What I would like to do is invite people to think not only about what they believe but also why they believe it. I invite the skeptics of the supernatural to consider the idea that affirming the endeavor of science does not require an atheistic worldview. I also invite people who might disregard science due to religious beliefs to explore that as well.

    I’m proud be a part of a university that fosters such a positive community of students. When we seek to understand the foundations of our own perspectives, as well as the views and beliefs of others, we make this community even better.

    I also want to invite you to a panel discussion with three Acadia Scientists on this very topic!

    “God & Science? A Panel Discussion With Scientists Who Believe” brings together geologist Dr. Robert Raeside, physicist Dr. Michael Robertson, chemist Dr. John Murimboh, as well as theologian Dr. Anna Robbins for a discussion about whether or not you can believe in both God and Science.

    When? – Wednesday, February 27th, 6:00 PM

    Where? – Fountain Commons at Acadia University

    Facebook Event: https://www.facebook.com/events/770242426690173/?ti=cl

    Zachary Goldsmith is a second-year Theology student and the Theology Senator for the Acadia Students’ Union

Betzillo positions itself as a versatile gaming hub where structured bonuses and adaptive gameplay mechanics support both short sessions and extended play.

Built with a focus on innovation, Spinbit integrates modern casino architecture with rapid transactions, appealing to players who value speed and digital efficiency.

Ripper Casino emphasizes bold entertainment through high-impact slot titles and competitive promotions crafted for risk-oriented players.

A friendly interface and stable performance define Ricky Casino, offering a casual yet reliable environment for a wide spectrum of gaming preferences.

King Billy Casino channels classic casino spirit into a modern platform, delivering recognizable themes supported by contemporary reward systems.

Immersive visuals and layered slot mechanics are at the core of Dragonslots, creating a narrative-driven casino experience.

Lukki Casino appeals to players seeking direct access and minimal friction, focusing on fast loading times and intuitive controls.

Casinonic provides a structured and dependable gaming framework, blending modern slots with transparent operational standards.